<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IP Reputation Portability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2007/09/ip-reputation-portability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2007/09/ip-reputation-portability/</link>
	<description>Email, Delivery, Spam and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:06:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: laura</title>
		<link>http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2007/09/ip-reputation-portability/comment-page-1/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wordtothewise.com/index.php/2007/09/24/ip-reputation-portability/#comment-538</guid>
		<description>The issue is that Microsoft has tied their hands by pushing SenderID, which only authenticates based on IP as presented in a SPF/SenderID record. It was a bad idea 3 years ago, it&#039;s a bad idea now, and it results in questions about how to transfer reputation between IP addresses.

You and I both know that IP reputation is a stop gap, but rolling out the real domain authentication technology is taking a very long time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue is that Microsoft has tied their hands by pushing SenderID, which only authenticates based on IP as presented in a SPF/SenderID record. It was a bad idea 3 years ago, it&#8217;s a bad idea now, and it results in questions about how to transfer reputation between IP addresses.</p>
<p>You and I both know that IP reputation is a stop gap, but rolling out the real domain authentication technology is taking a very long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2007/09/ip-reputation-portability/comment-page-1/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wordtothewise.com/index.php/2007/09/24/ip-reputation-portability/#comment-537</guid>
		<description>IP reputation is not portable.  That&#039;s what domain authentication is supposed to fix.  Hotmail&#039;s description misses the point that once you have an authenticated domain, the reputation of individual ips no longer matters, only the reputation of the domain as a whole.  Nothing needs to be &quot;transferred&quot;, it&#039;s all the same entity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IP reputation is not portable.  That&#8217;s what domain authentication is supposed to fix.  Hotmail&#8217;s description misses the point that once you have an authenticated domain, the reputation of individual ips no longer matters, only the reputation of the domain as a whole.  Nothing needs to be &#8220;transferred&#8221;, it&#8217;s all the same entity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

