<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Email authentication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/02/email-authentication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/02/email-authentication/</link>
	<description>Email, Delivery, Spam and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:16:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/02/email-authentication/comment-page-1/#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 20:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wordtothewise.com/index.php/2008/02/07/email-authentication/#comment-673</guid>
		<description>True.

If that&#039;s the case its kinda strange that they don&#039;t have SPF listed for us though, since we do publish both versions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True.</p>
<p>If that&#8217;s the case its kinda strange that they don&#8217;t have SPF listed for us though, since we do publish both versions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laura</title>
		<link>http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/02/email-authentication/comment-page-1/#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator>laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wordtothewise.com/index.php/2008/02/07/email-authentication/#comment-672</guid>
		<description>You do publish SenderID, though.

I think that chart is a way to show who is using technology either on the outbound or on the inbound. You&#039;re not using it inbound, but are publishing it for outbound.

;; ANSWER SECTION:

aol.com.                300     IN      TXT     &quot;spf2.0/pra ip4:152.163.225.0/24 ip4:205.188.139.0/24 ip4:205.188.144.0/24 ip4:205.188.156.0/23 ip4:205.188.159.0/24 ip4:64.12.136.0/23 ip4:64.12.138.0/24 ip4:64.12.143.99/32 ip4:64.12.143.100/32 ip4:64.12.143.101/32 ptr:mx.aol.com ?all&quot;

aol.com.                300     IN      TXT     &quot;v=spf1 ip4:152.163.225.0/24 ip4:205.188.139.0/24 ip4:205.188.144.0/24 ip4:205.188.156.0/23 ip4:205.188.159.0/24 ip4:64.12.136.0/23 ip4:64.12.138.0/24 ip4:64.12.143.99/32 ip4:64.12.143.100/32 ip4:64.12.143.101/32 ptr:mx.aol.com ?all&quot;

In my copious amounts of spare time I wanted to annotate that for inbound vs. outbound to make it clearer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do publish SenderID, though.</p>
<p>I think that chart is a way to show who is using technology either on the outbound or on the inbound. You&#8217;re not using it inbound, but are publishing it for outbound.</p>
<p>;; ANSWER SECTION:</p>
<p>aol.com.                300     IN      TXT     &#8220;spf2.0/pra ip4:152.163.225.0/24 ip4:205.188.139.0/24 ip4:205.188.144.0/24 ip4:205.188.156.0/23 ip4:205.188.159.0/24 ip4:64.12.136.0/23 ip4:64.12.138.0/24 ip4:64.12.143.99/32 ip4:64.12.143.100/32 ip4:64.12.143.101/32 ptr:mx.aol.com ?all&#8221;</p>
<p>aol.com.                300     IN      TXT     &#8220;v=spf1 ip4:152.163.225.0/24 ip4:205.188.139.0/24 ip4:205.188.144.0/24 ip4:205.188.156.0/23 ip4:205.188.159.0/24 ip4:64.12.136.0/23 ip4:64.12.138.0/24 ip4:64.12.143.99/32 ip4:64.12.143.100/32 ip4:64.12.143.101/32 ptr:mx.aol.com ?all&#8221;</p>
<p>In my copious amounts of spare time I wanted to annotate that for inbound vs. outbound to make it clearer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/02/email-authentication/comment-page-1/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wordtothewise.com/index.php/2008/02/07/email-authentication/#comment-671</guid>
		<description>Or it would be, it if was correct.

We don&#039;t use SenderID.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or it would be, it if was correct.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t use SenderID.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
