<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ESP unwittingly used to send spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/02/esp-unwittingly-used-to-send-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/02/esp-unwittingly-used-to-send-spam/</link>
	<description>Spam, delivery, email and more</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Denike</title>
		<link>http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/02/esp-unwittingly-used-to-send-spam/#comment-2005</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Denike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 01:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wordtothewise.com/index.php/2008/02/11/esp-unwittingly-used-to-send-spam/#comment-2005</guid>
		<description>I recall encountering a similar issue at my previous employer with our Ironport A60.  

We had a SMTPRoute which relayed a particular subdomain to an inside machine for processing.  (Bounces, etc.)  An outside sender (spammer) could craft a message with a rcpt to within that subdomain, but an envelope To of a third-party (spamee) address DIFFERENT than the rcpt to.  

The Ironport would happily forward the message to the inside box, which would then relay the message back outside.  

I wonder if this is the same issue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recall encountering a similar issue at my previous employer with our Ironport A60.  </p>
<p>We had a SMTPRoute which relayed a particular subdomain to an inside machine for processing.  (Bounces, etc.)  An outside sender (spammer) could craft a message with a rcpt to within that subdomain, but an envelope To of a third-party (spamee) address DIFFERENT than the rcpt to.  </p>
<p>The Ironport would happily forward the message to the inside box, which would then relay the message back outside.  </p>
<p>I wonder if this is the same issue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Word to the Wise &#187; Ironport response</title>
		<link>http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/02/esp-unwittingly-used-to-send-spam/#comment-1368</link>
		<dc:creator>Word to the Wise &#187; Ironport response</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wordtothewise.com/index.php/2008/02/11/esp-unwittingly-used-to-send-spam/#comment-1368</guid>
		<description>[...] by laura on 20 Feb 2008 at 01:42 pm &#124; Tagged as: Industry, Technical  Last week I posted about a ESP that had a misconfiguration in their Ironport A60s that let spammers use the A60s to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by laura on 20 Feb 2008 at 01:42 pm | Tagged as: Industry, Technical  Last week I posted about a ESP that had a misconfiguration in their Ironport A60s that let spammers use the A60s to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Hillyer.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Another Advantage of Feedback Loops</title>
		<link>http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/02/esp-unwittingly-used-to-send-spam/#comment-1367</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Hillyer.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Another Advantage of Feedback Loops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wordtothewise.com/index.php/2008/02/11/esp-unwittingly-used-to-send-spam/#comment-1367</guid>
		<description>[...] blog entry at Word To The Wise talks about a new exploit discovered in the IronPort A60 series: IronPort Open [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blog entry at Word To The Wise talks about a new exploit discovered in the IronPort A60 series: IronPort Open [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
