<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Predictions for 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/02/predictions-for-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/02/predictions-for-2008/</link>
	<description>Spam, delivery, email and more</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Denike</title>
		<link>http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/02/predictions-for-2008/#comment-2006</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Denike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 01:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wordtothewise.com/index.php/2008/02/01/predictions-for-2008/#comment-2006</guid>
		<description>What are your thoughts about DK versus DKIM?  

As I understand it, Yahoo is only checking DK, not DKIM, while Gmail is doing the opposite.

For a while, I was signing with both DK and DKIM, however this is prohibitive with my current (Ironport) setup.

Do you suggest tailoring the approach for each ESP?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are your thoughts about DK versus DKIM?  </p>
<p>As I understand it, Yahoo is only checking DK, not DKIM, while Gmail is doing the opposite.</p>
<p>For a while, I was signing with both DK and DKIM, however this is prohibitive with my current (Ironport) setup.</p>
<p>Do you suggest tailoring the approach for each ESP?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
