<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What really is &#8220;spam&#8221; anyway?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/02/what-really-is-spam-anyway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/02/what-really-is-spam-anyway/</link>
	<description>Spam, delivery, email and more</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Legal compliance is for lawyers not marketers &#124; The Marketr</title>
		<link>http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/02/what-really-is-spam-anyway/#comment-22316</link>
		<dc:creator>Legal compliance is for lawyers not marketers &#124; The Marketr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 13:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wordtothewise.com/index.php/2008/02/06/what-really-is-spam-anyway/#comment-22316</guid>
		<description>[...] Laura Atkins, founding partner of Word to the Wise (a consulting group for ISP abuse desks, ESPs and email marketrs):&#8220;CAN SPAM lists the minimal standards an email must meet in order to avoid prosecution. CAN SPAM does not define what is spam, it only defines the things senders must do in order to not be violating the act.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Laura Atkins, founding partner of Word to the Wise (a consulting group for ISP abuse desks, ESPs and email marketrs):&#8220;CAN SPAM lists the minimal standards an email must meet in order to avoid prosecution. CAN SPAM does not define what is spam, it only defines the things senders must do in order to not be violating the act.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Word to the Wise &#187; e360 v. Comcast: part 4</title>
		<link>http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/02/what-really-is-spam-anyway/#comment-2042</link>
		<dc:creator>Word to the Wise &#187; e360 v. Comcast: part 4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 00:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wordtothewise.com/index.php/2008/02/06/what-really-is-spam-anyway/#comment-2042</guid>
		<description>[...] with CAN SPAM, then their mail is therefore not spam. This is not true (see Al&#8217;s post, and my post and John&#8217;s post). Complying with CAN SPAM does not mean you are not sending spam. I will go [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with CAN SPAM, then their mail is therefore not spam. This is not true (see Al&#8217;s post, and my post and John&#8217;s post). Complying with CAN SPAM does not mean you are not sending spam. I will go [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Word to the Wise &#187; e360 v. Comcast: part 1</title>
		<link>http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/02/what-really-is-spam-anyway/#comment-1571</link>
		<dc:creator>Word to the Wise &#187; e360 v. Comcast: part 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 01:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wordtothewise.com/index.php/2008/02/06/what-really-is-spam-anyway/#comment-1571</guid>
		<description>[...] Legal  A few weeks ago I very briefly touched on the recent lawsuits filed by e360 against Comcast and a group of anti-spammers. In the Comcast suit (complaint here) e360 argues that Comcast is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Legal  A few weeks ago I very briefly touched on the recent lawsuits filed by e360 against Comcast and a group of anti-spammers. In the Comcast suit (complaint here) e360 argues that Comcast is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
