<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Address harvesting through social networks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/04/address-harvesting-through-social-networks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/04/address-harvesting-through-social-networks/</link>
	<description>Spam, delivery, email and more</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Reunion.com sued under CA anti-spam law at Word to the Wise</title>
		<link>http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/04/address-harvesting-through-social-networks/#comment-20125</link>
		<dc:creator>Reunion.com sued under CA anti-spam law at Word to the Wise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 22:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wordtothewise.com/?p=121#comment-20125</guid>
		<description>[...] Part of the case is related to Reunion.com&#8217;s scraping of address books, something I have discussed here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part of the case is related to Reunion.com&#8217;s scraping of address books, something I have discussed here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brielle's Droning</title>
		<link>http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/04/address-harvesting-through-social-networks/#comment-14519</link>
		<dc:creator>Brielle's Droning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 18:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wordtothewise.com/?p=121#comment-14519</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Reunion.com added to the AHBL...&lt;/strong&gt;

After a request by one of our users, I've added Reunion.com to the Abusive Hosts Blocking List for spamming people's contacts through social networking sites like Facebook.  Laura did a pretty good post on her blog about the issue....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Reunion.com added to the AHBL&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>After a request by one of our users, I&#8217;ve added Reunion.com to the Abusive Hosts Blocking List for spamming people&#8217;s contacts through social networking sites like Facebook.  Laura did a pretty good post on her blog about the issue&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Doherty</title>
		<link>http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/04/address-harvesting-through-social-networks/#comment-8015</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Doherty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 00:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wordtothewise.com/?p=121#comment-8015</guid>
		<description>my issue is
a) consent of their subscriber to give them their address book isn't enough. {even when given}
my consent wasn't asked for or given.
{if this was one company giving your details to another it would be a cut n dry data protection case)

b) these sites should be added to the same lists as malware and phishing sites as in essence they are 'grooming' users for later abuse by phising sites by encouraging them to 'share' their authentication

c) sites like yahoo gmail hotmail and aol should for the protection of their users be activly blocking logins from their ip-space and/or tracking what id's attempt to so they can e-mail reprimand them for abusing their TOS by giving out their passwords

d) many sites now abuse this lax user generation to actually harvest login details to jabber/messenger/yahoo-im spam their contacts from their trusted contact's id while the trusted contact is offline.
{also the traditional spamming them via the contacts webmail}

e) the trusted sites that do abide by their privacy policies and never send the invites {while searching their internal userlists only} are the guilty ones as they are the ones blurring the lines and making people willing to give tothers MY EMAIL, without MY permission as they know that I will never find out.

people need to respect their friends property and privacy
the same way as they do when a mutual friend asks for anothers phone number, most of us have the respect to ask before handing it on to a mutual contact, so why now are we allowing a generation to learn that its kosher to give their friends e-mail's to random third parties</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my issue is<br />
a) consent of their subscriber to give them their address book isn&#8217;t enough. {even when given}<br />
my consent wasn&#8217;t asked for or given.<br />
{if this was one company giving your details to another it would be a cut n dry data protection case)</p>
<p>b) these sites should be added to the same lists as malware and phishing sites as in essence they are &#8216;grooming&#8217; users for later abuse by phising sites by encouraging them to &#8217;share&#8217; their authentication</p>
<p>c) sites like yahoo gmail hotmail and aol should for the protection of their users be activly blocking logins from their ip-space and/or tracking what id&#8217;s attempt to so they can e-mail reprimand them for abusing their TOS by giving out their passwords</p>
<p>d) many sites now abuse this lax user generation to actually harvest login details to jabber/messenger/yahoo-im spam their contacts from their trusted contact&#8217;s id while the trusted contact is offline.<br />
{also the traditional spamming them via the contacts webmail}</p>
<p>e) the trusted sites that do abide by their privacy policies and never send the invites {while searching their internal userlists only} are the guilty ones as they are the ones blurring the lines and making people willing to give tothers MY EMAIL, without MY permission as they know that I will never find out.</p>
<p>people need to respect their friends property and privacy<br />
the same way as they do when a mutual friend asks for anothers phone number, most of us have the respect to ask before handing it on to a mutual contact, so why now are we allowing a generation to learn that its kosher to give their friends e-mail&#8217;s to random third parties</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
