Comments on: Judge rules in e360 v. Comcast http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/04/judge-rules-in-e360-v-comcast/ Email, Delivery, Spam and more Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:06:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: We’re gonna party like it’s 1996! – Word to the Wise http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/04/judge-rules-in-e360-v-comcast/comment-page-1/#comment-6400 We’re gonna party like it’s 1996! – Word to the Wise Mon, 06 Sep 2010 18:43:31 +0000 http://blog.wordtothewise.com/?p=120#comment-6400 [...] There is existing case law that states that spam blocking falls is protected under the CDA, including e360Insight, LLC v. Comcast. [...] [...] There is existing case law that states that spam blocking falls is protected under the CDA, including e360Insight, LLC v. Comcast. [...]

]]> By: Useful Arts Online Law Blog http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/04/judge-rules-in-e360-v-comcast/comment-page-1/#comment-831 Useful Arts Online Law Blog Mon, 23 Jun 2008 06:26:22 +0000 http://blog.wordtothewise.com/?p=120#comment-831 Though unscrupulous marketers *can* spam, its good that ISP’s can filer their messages based on any number of good faith measures, such as sessage content (buy viagra), sender address (i sell viagra), or even patterns of user complaints (enough with the viagra already). This puts subscribers back in charge. If subscribers ever feel over filtered, you can bet ISPs will quickly respond to them. I've linked to your article from my blog on online law - and look forward to reading more of your posts on Email, the Internet's true killer app. Thanks! Though unscrupulous marketers *can* spam, its good that ISP’s can filer their messages based on any number of good faith measures, such as sessage content (buy viagra), sender address (i sell viagra), or even patterns of user complaints (enough with the viagra already).

This puts subscribers back in charge. If subscribers ever feel over filtered, you can bet ISPs will quickly respond to them.

I’ve linked to your article from my blog on online law – and look forward to reading more of your posts on Email, the Internet’s true killer app. Thanks!

]]> By: Why Marketers Need to Go Beyond CAN-SPAM’s Modest Requirements | UsefulArts.us http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/04/judge-rules-in-e360-v-comcast/comment-page-1/#comment-830 Why Marketers Need to Go Beyond CAN-SPAM’s Modest Requirements | UsefulArts.us Mon, 23 Jun 2008 06:17:50 +0000 http://blog.wordtothewise.com/?p=120#comment-830 [...] reasons not to. Recently, James B. Zagel of the U.S. District Court in Northern Illinois rulled in e360 v. Comcast that Internet service providers (ISPs) are not liable for mistakenly blocking even [...] [...] reasons not to. Recently, James B. Zagel of the U.S. District Court in Northern Illinois rulled in e360 v. Comcast that Internet service providers (ISPs) are not liable for mistakenly blocking even [...]

]]>