Comments on: Judge rules in e360 v. Comcast http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/04/judge-rules-in-e360-v-comcast/ Spam, delivery, email and more Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:35:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Useful Arts Online Law Blog http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/04/judge-rules-in-e360-v-comcast/#comment-14887 Useful Arts Online Law Blog Mon, 23 Jun 2008 06:26:22 +0000 http://blog.wordtothewise.com/?p=120#comment-14887 Though unscrupulous marketers *can* spam, its good that ISP’s can filer their messages based on any number of good faith measures, such as sessage content (buy viagra), sender address (i sell viagra), or even patterns of user complaints (enough with the viagra already). This puts subscribers back in charge. If subscribers ever feel over filtered, you can bet ISPs will quickly respond to them. I've linked to your article from my blog on online law - and look forward to reading more of your posts on Email, the Internet's true killer app. Thanks! Though unscrupulous marketers *can* spam, its good that ISP’s can filer their messages based on any number of good faith measures, such as sessage content (buy viagra), sender address (i sell viagra), or even patterns of user complaints (enough with the viagra already).

This puts subscribers back in charge. If subscribers ever feel over filtered, you can bet ISPs will quickly respond to them.

I’ve linked to your article from my blog on online law - and look forward to reading more of your posts on Email, the Internet’s true killer app. Thanks!

]]> By: Why Marketers Need to Go Beyond CAN-SPAM’s Modest Requirements | UsefulArts.us http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/04/judge-rules-in-e360-v-comcast/#comment-14886 Why Marketers Need to Go Beyond CAN-SPAM’s Modest Requirements | UsefulArts.us Mon, 23 Jun 2008 06:17:50 +0000 http://blog.wordtothewise.com/?p=120#comment-14886 [...] reasons not to. Recently, James B. Zagel of the U.S. District Court in Northern Illinois rulled in e360 v. Comcast that Internet service providers (ISPs) are not liable for mistakenly blocking even [...] [...] reasons not to. Recently, James B. Zagel of the U.S. District Court in Northern Illinois rulled in e360 v. Comcast that Internet service providers (ISPs) are not liable for mistakenly blocking even [...]

]]>