<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Political Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/05/political-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/05/political-spam/</link>
	<description>Spam, delivery, email and more</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Venkat</title>
		<link>http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/05/political-spam/#comment-14176</link>
		<dc:creator>Venkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 23:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wordtothewise.com/?p=150#comment-14176</guid>
		<description>I agree with you.  

However, I'm wondering whether actual political speech can be distinguished from fundraising emails.  In the end I guess it's all "political expression," but maybe there's room to split hairs there.  (This doesn't have much support in the cases . . . as far as I know, political speech/"speech" is broadly defined.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you.  </p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m wondering whether actual political speech can be distinguished from fundraising emails.  In the end I guess it&#8217;s all &#8220;political expression,&#8221; but maybe there&#8217;s room to split hairs there.  (This doesn&#8217;t have much support in the cases . . . as far as I know, political speech/&#8221;speech&#8221; is broadly defined.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://blog.wordtothewise.com/2008/05/political-spam/#comment-14158</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 17:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wordtothewise.com/?p=150#comment-14158</guid>
		<description>I couldn't agree with you more: "Meeting these conditions is trivial for any legitimate candidate and gives the recipients that warm fuzzy feeling that the candidate is acting in good faith."

-Anna</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more: &#8220;Meeting these conditions is trivial for any legitimate candidate and gives the recipients that warm fuzzy feeling that the candidate is acting in good faith.&#8221;</p>
<p>-Anna</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
