Skip to content


Hidden cost of email blasts

Seth Godin has a post up today talking about how friction, that is the cost of sending marketing, is good for marketing. With more friction, marketers make choices about sending instead of sending to everyone.

The post touches on a point I’ve certainly tried to explain to clients and senders in general.

Email, of course, is free.

Except it’s not. The friction that slows down sending email to everyone all the time is the cost of all the people you’ll lose. You might lose them because they unsubscribe, or more likely, you’ll train them to ignore you. Worse still, you might just make them annoyed enough to badmouth you.

Yes! Not only do senders risk alienating subscribers, those non-responsive addresses can turn into a reputation liability. The reputation schemes at most of the major ISPs look at if recipients interacting with email. Training recipients to ignore mail trains the reputation filters that mail, and mail from that sender in general, isn’t wanted.

Senders must implement list hygiene programs and data segmentation to keep reputation high.

Mark Brownlow has more on why list hygiene programs are critical.

Tags: , , .


One Response

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

Continuing the Discussion

  1. Google Reader Links for First Day of Fall | Email Marketing | Email | ScottWritesEverything.com linked to this post on September 22, 2009

    [...] to the Wise Blog – “The hidden cost of email blasts.” @wise_laura talks about Seth Godin and the costs of email blasts. Reminds me a bit of my [...]



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.



Follow me on Twitter